Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Ohio App. 3d 708 - State v. Lather

171 Ohio App. 3d 708 - State v. Lather’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Adams · State v. Sage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well-established that a trial court does not abuse its discretion in calling a witness as a court's witness when the witness's testimony would be beneficial to ascertaining the truth of the matter and there is some indication that the witness's trial testimony will contradict a prior statement made to police.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he court may, on its own motion or at the suggestion of a party, call witnesses, and all parties are entitled to cross-examine witnesses thus called.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.