Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 OHIOST3D 775 - State v. Bunch

State v. Bunch’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States · Harrington v. Richter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[a] trial court properly denies a defendant's petition for postconviction relief without holding an evidentiary hearing where the petition, the supporting affidavits, the documentary evidence, the files, - 11 - Butler CA2023-07-083 and the records do not demonstrate that petitioner set forth sufficient operative facts to establish substantive grounds for relief.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “In determining whether the petition states a substantive ground for relief, the trial court must consider the entirety of the record from the trial proceedings as well as any evidence filed by the parties in postconviction proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If the record on its face demonstrates that the petitioner is not entitled to relief, then the trial court must dismiss the petition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.