Stephenson v. Clement’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2019
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stone v. Case · Aylesbury Mercantile Co. v. Fitch · Meshek v. Cordes · Bryan v. Sullivan · First Nat. Bank of McLoud v. City Nat. Bank of Wellington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A mortgage or lien foreclosure is an equitable a.ction and involves in the final analysis: (1) The adjudication of plaintiff’s claim and the establishment of his lien; (2) the adjudication of all liens and determination of their validity and priority and the adjudication of all claims, titles, or interests in the property involved; (3) the extinsnisbment of all equities o£ redemption of all parties who may have an equity of redemption; (4) so that a valid and effectual sale 'of the property may he bad. Chat is. so that the title may be in such condition that a sale may be had where a purchaser may purchase without, the necessity of any further litigation. All parties whose claim or interest may be affected by the sale or which claim or interest may effect the sale are proper parties in a mortgage or lien foreclosure action.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The mere fact that one or more causes of action are on contract and one in tort is united therewith in the same petition does not constitute a misjoinder. Causes of action in tort may be joined in separate counts in the same petition with causes of action in contract when they all arise out of the same transaction or transactions connected with the same subject of the action, and where they all affect all the parties to the action, and we so held in Aylesbury Merc. Co. v. Fitch, 22 Okla. 475 , 99 P. 1089 , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 573. Blit causes of action cannot ordinarily be joined unless they affect all the parties to the action. First National Bank of McLoud v. City National Bank of Wellington et al., 71 Okla. 52 , 175 P. 253 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.