Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Okla. 418 - Small v. Comer

Small v. Comer’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1991

14 state decisions

401935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Covington v. Fisher · Garfield Oil Co. v. Champlin · Bell v. Tackett · Billy v. Le Flore County Gas & Electric Co. · Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Opinion evidence of. duly qualified expert as to the speed of a motor vehicle, traveling upon a highway, based on skid marks on the highway and other physical facts, is admissible.” “Whether or not the qualifications of a witness with respect to knowledge or special experience is sufficiently established is a preliminary question for determination by the trial judge, and his ruling thereon will not be disturbed in the absence of a showing of abuse of judicial discretion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ . . . [A] party cannot in fact have inconsistent defenses. It is impossible that a thing may be true and untrue at the same time. For this reason parties are not allowed to set up inconsistent defenses, for such defenses carry falsehood upon their face.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.