Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

171 Or. App. 401

16 P.3d 1164

State v. Cheney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 2000

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2000-12-13

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2013

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WOLLHEIM, J.,

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur with the majority’s decision that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s post-trial motion to interview jurors and motion for a new trial. Koennecke v. State of Oregon, 122 Or App 100, 857 P2d 148, rev den 318 Or 26 (1993), mandates the result here. However, if I were writing on a clean slate, I would reverse based on the reasoning set forth in Judge De Muniz’s dissent in Koennecke, 122 Or App at 105-07.

/171/orapp/401 · .json · Public domain