Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 SO2D 759 - Baughman v. Wells

Baughman v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 1978
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Oakes v. H. Weil Baking Co. · Fontenelle v. Waguespack · Finkelstein v. Naihaus · Harvey v. Harvey · Bankston v. Forks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It appears, therefore, that while abusive, insulting, or defamatory remarks applied by a plaintiff to a defendant may be shown in a civil action as a provocation for assault and battery, this may be done only if the derogatory remarks were such as to justify the conclusion that it should have been anticipated that physical retaliation would be attempted and be looked upon as the certain forerunner of a violent physical encounter."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.