171 So. 3d 1047 - LaGraize v. Filson’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. Thompson · 828 So. 2d 1094 - Curole v. Curole · Gathen v. Gathen · H.S.C. v. C.E.C. · 974 So. 2d 726 - McLain v. McLain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The nature, quality, extent of involvement, and duration of the relationship of the child with the person proposing relocation and with the ' non-relocating person, siblings, and other significant persons in in the child’s life. (2) The age, developmental' stage, heeds of the child, and the likely impact the relocation will-have on the child’s physical, educational, and emotional development. (3) The feasibility of preserving a good relationship between the non-relocating person and the child through suitable physical custody or visitation arrangements, considering the logistics and- financial circumstances of the parties. (4) The child’s views about the proposed relocation, taking into consideration the age and maturity of the child. ' (5) Whether there- is an established pattern of conduct by either the person seeking or the person opposing the relocation, either to promote or thwart the relationship of the child and the other party. .- (6) How the relocation of the child will affect the general quality of life for the child, including but not limited to financial or emotional benefit and educational opportunity. (7) The reasons of each person for seeking or opposing the relocation. (8) The current employment and economic circumstances of each person and how the proposed relocation may affect the circumstances of the child. (9) The extent to which the objecting person has fulfilled his financial obligations to the person seeking relocation,- including child support, spo”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.