Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

171 So. 3d 244

Testa v. Testa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 27, 2015

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-08-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2016

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Spencer · Delgado v. Hearn · Bolton v. SE Property Holdings, LLC

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-08-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The former husband seeks certiorari review of a trial court order that barred him from further pro se filing in this 2008 post-dissolution family law case. We grant-the petition and quash the order because the trial court did not issue an order to show cause and did not provide notice and an *245opportunity to respond before imposing the sanction. Bolton v. SE Prop. Holdings, LLC, 127 So.3d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Delgado v. Hearn, 805 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

¶2On remand, the trial court shall issue an order to show cause and afford the former husband a reasonable time to respond before determining whether the sanction is appropriate.

¶3Petition granted and order quashed.

LEVINE, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
/171/so3d/244 · .json · Public domain