State v. Tolliver’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The record does not affirmatively indicate that the circuit CQurt weighed each of the factors as required by Barker . Therefore, we remand, this case for the trial court to make specific, written findings of fact as to each Barker factor with reference to the principles set forth by the Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Walker, [ 928 So.2d 259 (Ala.2005)]. See, e.g., Parris v. State, 885 So.2d 813 (Ala. Crim.App.2001). If the trial court determines that it needs to conduct an additional hearing to take additional evidence or to hear additional arguments, it may do so.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Batts v. State