171 Tex. Crim. 600 - Fowler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1990
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 165 Tex. Crim. 120 - Massoletti v. State · Pierson v. State · 149 Tex. Crim. 612 - Allen v. State · 157 Tex. Crim. 556 - Atkinson v. State · 169 Tex. Crim. 382 - Root v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * This testimony was no doubt prejudicial and inflammatory to the rights of the appellant before the'jury,' and it probably resulted in the imposition of a heavier penalty than would have been imposed absent this testimony. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reynolds v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.