Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 U.S. 658 - People Parke Davis Co v. Roberts

People Parke Davis Co v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

171 U.S. 658 · 1898

Citation profile

163
cited by 163 later decisions
38
cited 38 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 5 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 163 later decisions (38 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2001 · most notably Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. (1911), Western and Southern Life Insurance Company v. State Board of Equalization of California (1981)

36 federal appellate · 5 district · 47 state decisions — followed in 21 states

360189819001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smyth v. Ames · Paul v. Virginia · Brown v. Maryland · Robbins v. Taxing District of Shelby Co Tennessee · Aaron Cooley v. The Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia to the Use of the Society for the Relief of Distressed Pilots Their Widows and Children Same

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 163 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But that ease is inapplicable. Here no tax is sought to be imposed directly on imported articles or on their sale. This is a tax imposed on the business of a corporation, consisting in the storage and distribution of various binds of goods, some products of tbeir own manufacture, and some imported articles. From the very nature of the tax, being laid as a tax upon the franchise of doing business as a corporation, it cannot be affected in any way by the character of the property in which its capital stock is invested. Society v. Coite, 6 Wall. 594 , 18 L. Ed. 897 ; Provident Inst. for Savings v. Massachusetts, 6 Wall. 611 , 18 L. Ed. 907 ; Pembina Consol. Silver Min. & Mill. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 125 U. S. 181 , 8 Sup. Ct. 737 , 31 L. Ed. 650 ; Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 134 U. S. 594 , 10 Sup. Ct. 593 , 33 L. Ed. 1025 .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The amount of capital stock which shall be the basis for tax under the provisions of section three, in the case of every corporation, joint stock company and association liable to taxation thereunder, shall be the amount of capital stock employed within this state ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he object or purpose of legislation is to be determined by its natural and reasonable effect, whatever may have been the motives upon which legislators acted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.