Staub v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 310
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · United Mine Workers of America District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“disability benefits from the VA under 38 U.S.C. § 310. In accordance with applicable VA regulations, 1 appellant requested and was afforded the right to a hearing, to assistance at that hearing and to arrangements for the attendance of witnesses. Following the initial hearing, the claim for benefits was denied on the grounds that the disability was not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Staub v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.