Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Vt. 290 - State v. Bean

State v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Cleary (2003), State v. Tribble (2005)

40 state decisions

240200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Dusky v. United States · Godinez v. Moran · 19 Cal. 3d 121 - People v. Windham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is the trial court's responsibility, in the first instance, to evaluate the evidence and to determine whether defendant's competency meets the constitutional standard. See 13 V.S.A. § 4817(b). If the court's findings are supported by credible evidence and not clearly erroneous, they must be upheld.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Gokey
  2. ““the quality of counsel’s representation of the defendant, the defendant’s proclivity to substitute counsel, the reasons for the request [for withdrawal], the length and stage of the proceedings, and the disruption or delay which might reasonably be expected to follow the granting of such a motion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In re E.T.
  3. “most courts have held that the right to self-representation must be invoked before trial to be considered timely per se”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In re G.G.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.