Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Wash. 92 - State v. Linden

State v. Linden’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
6
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably State v. Agnew (1978), 30 Wash. App. 119 - State v. Eppens (1981)

41 state decisions

90193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allis v. United States · State v. Carey · Lacey v. State · Wall v. State · State v. Peasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(7) "Wrongfully obtains" or "exerts unauthorized control" means: .... (b) Having any property or services in one's possession, custody or control as bailee, factor, pledgee, servant, attorney, agent, employee, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or officer of any person, estate, association, or corporation, or as a public officer, or person authorized by agreement or competent authority to take or hold such possession, custody, or control, to secrete, withhold, or appropriate the same to his or her own use or to the use of any person other than the true owner or person entitled thereto[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the periods covered by the different counts are separate and distinct, as they are in this case, the wrongful appropriations during each period may be charged in a different count.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “based on the assumption that the appropriations ... constituted a continuous offense, and ... could not be grouped in three separate periods and a count based upon each period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.