State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 118 Wash. 2d 801 - Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley · 126 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Ritchie · State v. Moen · 115 Wash. 2d 445 - State v. Pryor · 123 Wash. 2d 391 - Caritas Services, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant herein would rather abandon his appeal rather than go to a new sentencing hearing to reconsider the original decision to impose a SSOSA sentence in spite of the fact that the trial court imposed an obviously unconstitutional banishment order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims“[b]ecause the purpose of the condition [i.e., protection of the victim] can still be achieved, limiting the remand to revision of the condition does not subvert the trial court's original decision to grant a SSOSA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims“I don't think this young girl should ever have to see [Sims] again in her life. And I will not allow him to remain in that community and grant SSOSA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.