Eugster v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reynolds v. Sims · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City · Wells v. Edwards · 125 Wash. 2d 129 - Carrick v. Locke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“require one-person, one-vote apportionment for judicial elections, instead focusing on the general premise that article I, section 19 should apply to judicial elections. ¶ 9 In interpreting constitutional provisions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eugster v. State“There shall be in each of the organized counties of this state a superior court for which at least one judge shall be elected by the qualified electors of the county at the general state election.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Eugster v. State“the senators shall be elected by single districts of convenient and contiguous territory ... and no representative district shall be divided in the formation of a senatorial district”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Eugster v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.