Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 WIS 20 - McCall v. Bilty

McCall v. Bilty’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1969
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1969

5 state decisions

2019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. State · Sweet v. Modern Woodmen of America · Jones v. Roberts · Schamper v. Ullrich · Davis v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, we again reserve the question, preferring to withhold a definite decision thereof until it shall be necessarily involved and we have had the benefit of full argument thereon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.