Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 Wis. 2d 207 - State v. Moley

171 Wis. 2d 207 - State v. Moley’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dunn · SGRO v. United States · Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico · United States v. McNeese · State v. Valenzuela

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Stale probable cause, so called, is probable cause that would have justified a warrant at some earlier moment that has already passed by the time the warrant is sought. There is not, however, any dispositive significance in the mere fact that some information offered to demonstrate probable cause may be called stale, in the sense that it concerns events that occurred well before the date of the application for the warrant. If such past fact contributes to an inference that probable cause exists at the time of the application, its age is no taint.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “new data to create present probable cause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.