Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 171 WIS2D 690 - State v. Batista

State v. Batista’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 52 Wis. 2d 144 - Rahhal v. State · 163 Wis. 2d 622 - State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Circuit Court for Racine County · 118 Wis. 2d 21 - State v. Haynes · 64 Wis. 2d 24 - Phifer v. State · 50 Wis. 2d 280 - State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rights of accused. Section 7. In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to be heard by himself and counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him; to meet the witnesses face to face; to have compulsory process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his behalf; and in prosecutions by indictment, or information, to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county or district wherein the offense shall have been committed; which county or district shall have been previously ascertained by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 199 Wis. 2d 721 - State v. Cummings
  2. “that once representation is undertaken, counsel cannot walk away from the defendant or from the case. If counsel wishes to be released from responsibility to the defendant, counsel must request the trial court to be relieved of his or her obligation to represent the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Bailey
  3. “(2) In the event the court or public defender authorizes an attorney to withdraw, the state public defender shall assign the attorney who appears on the top of the appropriate certification list and place the original attorney's name on the top of that list.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 199 Wis. 2d 721 - State v. Cummings

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.