¶1Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the clause in the contract providing that “ any stock which does not prove to be true to name, as labeled, is to be replaced free, or purchase price refunded, but is not further warranted,” limited plaintiff’s recovery to the purchase price of said trees. All concurred.
172 A.D. 936
Plimpton v. Brown Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1916-01-15
Decided 1916-01-15