¶1The order appealed from should be reversed in so far as it denies the motion to make Henry M. Susswein, as administrator, etc., a party defendant, and affirmed in so far as it denies the motion to make Oscar Herrmann a party defendant, and to the extent stated the motion is granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to the appellant against the administrator. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order reversed as to Henry Susswein, as administrator, etc., and affirmed as to Oscar Herrmann, and motion granted to the extent stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the administrator. Order to be settled on notice.
172 A.D. 944
Herrmann v. Herrmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 15, 1916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1916-02-15
<p>Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 33d day of November, 1915, denying a motion to revive the action against the administrator of the estate of a deceased defendant, and to join the administrator and the heir and next of kin of the decedent as parties defendant.</p>
Decided 1916-02-15