Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 ALA 104 - Lester v. Walker

Lester v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1986

6 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

8019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Ward · Langley v. Andrews · Bank of Guntersville v. Webb · King v. Paulk · Martinez v. Lindsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of misrepresentation, fraud, or deceit, the execution of an instrument by one who can read and write is binding upon him, even though he did not read it, or was ignorant of its contents. Bank of Guntersville v. Webb & Butler, 108 Ala. 132, 19 South. 14.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.