Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 ARIZ 15 - State v. Benson

State v. Benson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2016

24 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Rio Grande · United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $2,857.00 · United States v. Yukon Delta Houseboat · United States v. U.S. Currency, in the Amount of $103,387.27 · United States v. Fifteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($15,500.00) United States Currency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To contest a forfeiture action, one must be a party to the action and have standing. In a civil forfeiture action, one acquires standing by alleging an interest in the property. Under Arizona statutes, an owner or interest holder in property subject to forfeiture alleges an interest by filing a claim against the property. The claim must include the elements set forth in A.R.S. § 13-4311.E. Once the owner or interest holder files a proper claim, he becomes a “claimant” and is entitled to a hearing to adjudicate the validity of his interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “3. The nature and extent of the claimant’s interest in the property. 4. The time, transferor and circumstances of the claimant’s acquisition of the interest in the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.