State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Stone v. Powell · Michigan v. Tucker · State v. Gerlaugh · State v. Prince
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“believe[d] that the exclusionary rule [was] not intended to deter justice court employees or Sheriff's Office employees who are not directly associated with the arresting officers or the arresting officers' police department.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Arizona v. Evans“perhaps the negligence of the Justice Court, or the negligence of the Sheriff's office. But it is still the negligence of the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arizona v. Evans“the purpose of the exclusionary rule would not be served by excluding the evidence obtained in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Arizona v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.