Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 ARK 983 - Wacaster v. State

Wacaster v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 1973
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1973

10 state decisions

30192719301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pearson v. State · Wawak and Vaught v. State · Hinson v. State · Cooper v. State · Bullard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is, of course, not only improper, but is error calling for the reversal of the judgment, for the Court to communicate with the Jury, in the absence of the defendant, any directions in regard to their verdict.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.