Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 Cal. 512 - People v. Kromphold

People v. Kromphold’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
6
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 1980 · most notably 27 Cal. 3d 1 - People v. Green (1980), 68 Cal. 2d 375 - Maine v. Superior Court (1968)

2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

24019161920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Goldenson · People v. Glaze · People v. Schafer · People v. Staples · People v. Fredericks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While (tetendant exercised all of the 20, peremptory challenges allowed by the law, it was not made to appear that he desired to exercise any additional challenge; or that he had the slightest objection to any juror sworn to try the cause, or any disposition to have any such juror excused. * * * No challenge for cause was interposed by defendant as to any such juror. Under these circumstances, the claim of defendant that the court erred in disallowing his challenge for cause to three jurors who did not serve on the trial is disposed of by People v. Schafer, 161 Oal. 573.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Merritt v. United States
  2. ““ . . . The important thing is that it does not appear that an objectionable juror was forced upon the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Encinas v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.