Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 CALAPP2D 474 - People v. Barton

People v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1968
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sealfon v. United States · United States v. De Angelo · Harris v. State · People v. Bumbaugh · Yawn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court: The Court finds the defendant guilty of violation of Section 245, assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, an offense necessarily included in that charged in the Information. I believe it is included. Wouldn’t you say so ? “Mb. Obb [Deputy District Attorney] : It is, your Honor. That is in Count II. “The Court: Well, I am not finding Mm guilty of Count II, assault with a deadly weapon. This is included. It will be included in Count II, I take it? “Mr. Orb: That’s correct. “Mb. Reynolds [Deputy Public Defender]: I take it your Honor is finding the defendant not guilty of Count I. “The Court: Not guilty of Count I and Counts [sic] II, but guilty of a necessarily included offense in Count II, an assault by means of force like [sic] to produce great bodily injury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.