Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 CALAPP2D 580 - Mitchell v. Jones

Mitchell v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Calvert Bay Area Factors Division of Dimmitt Owens Financial Inc v. Calvert (1997), 6 Cal. App. 3d 626 - Myers v. County of Orange (1970)

21 state decisions

1301959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 21 Cal. 2d 636 - Panos v. Great Western Packing Co. · 15 Cal. 2d 195 - Sutphin v. Speik · Brown v. Brown · Todhunter v. Smith · Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The default judgment ... did not determine that she (defendant) was not guilty of negligently excavating her property. This was not raised by her pleadings and a determination of this question clearly was not required to uphold the default judg ment. Assuming, arguendo, that the question of defendant’s excavation would have constituted a defense to her action, the default judgment does not 'preclude subsequent litigation on this issue in California for this question was not raised by the pleadings, nor was its resolution necessary to uphold the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A judgment by default is as conclusive as to the issues tendered by the complaint as if it had been rendered after answer filed and trial had on allegations denied by the answer. [Citations.] Such a judgment is res judicata as to all issues aptly pleaded in the complaint and defendant is estopped from denying in a subsequent action any allegations contained in the former complaint. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is limited to the material issuable facts which are well pleaded in the declaration or complaint. The judgment does not extend to issues which were not raised in the pleadings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.