Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 Colo. 434 - People v. Williams

People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2009

22 state decisions

1201970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. People · Dodge v. People · Kelley v. People · Deshler Broom Factory v. Kinney · Lidke v. Industrial Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the court shall review the case on the record on appeal and affirm, reverse, remand, or modify the judgment; except that the district court in its discretion, may remand the case for a new trial with such instructions as it may deem necessary, or it may direct that the case be retried de novo before the district court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “recognized the historical differences between the two both procedurally and in substance, so it is incumbent on the courts to make the same differentiation in carrying out their functions under the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The statute provides a procedure whereby the district court can act as a trial court rather than as a court of review, if it adopts the third alternative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.