Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

172 F. 1023

In re Plaut

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1908.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1908-11-27

1 counsel of record

Relies on In re Rothschild

Decided 1908-11-27

¶1See, also, 154 Fed. 194, 83 C. C. A. 288.

¶2S. S. Myers, for the motion. .1. Moble Hayes, opposed.

¶3Before UACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER OIJRIAM.

¶5It is unnecessary to go into any of the points of law which have been raised on this motion. We are not prepared to hold that it was an improper exercise of the discretion of the District Judge to require the plaintiff to terminate his prior state court action, either by (rial or discontinuance, before proceeding to the trial of the second and later one, which he has brought on precisely the same cause of action.

/172/f1d/1023 · .json · Public domain