In re Dobbs’s Empirical Analysis
172 F. 682 · 1909
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 1917
most recently cited
3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Waxelbaum · In re Stephens · In re Williamson · In re Boorstin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Ho appears to have kept no satisfactory hooks of account from which the facts as to what he had done with his property and how there had been such a remarkable change in his business could be ascertained.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Najour · In re Nejour
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.