Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 F.2d 295 - Martin v. The Bud

Martin v. The Bud’s Empirical Analysis

172 F.2d 295 · 1949

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
August 1991
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1991

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

70194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2464

Relies on The Rio Grande · Agricultural Cooperative Ass'n v. The Denny · Compania Transatlantica v. United States · Canal Steel Works, Inc. v. One Drag Line Dredge · Estonian State Cargo & Passenger S. S. Line v. Kaiv

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o supersedeas bond was filed, nor was any stay of execution obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.