Simmons v. Westover

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 27, 1949.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-01-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1951

2 counsel of record

Relies on 76 F. Supp. 442 - Simmons v. Westover

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Latham & Watkins, Dana Latham, and Henry C. Diehl, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. •

¶2Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis -N. Slack, Robert N. Anderson, John W. Fisher, and Melva M. Gr-aney, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and James M. Carter, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell and George M. Bryant, Asst. U. S. Atty-s., and Eugene Harpole, Sp. Atty. B.I.R., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before STEPHENS, HEALY, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This court being in agreement with the judgment of the district court herein and with the opinion of District Judge Weinberger published in 76 F.Supp. 442, therefore orders the judgment.

¶6Affirmed.