Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 F.2d 720 - Fay v. Douds

Fay v. Douds’s Empirical Analysis

172 F.2d 720 · 1949

Citation profile

216
cited by 216 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

123 federal appellate · 26 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 216 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2016 · most notably United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co. (1956), Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis (1969)

123 federal appellate · 26 district · 10 state decisions

88019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Hillsborough Tp Somerset County Nj v. Cromwell · Fitzgerald v. Douds · Eubanks v. Thompson · National Maritime Union of America v. Herzog

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 216 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i)f this assertion of constitutional right is not transparently frivolous, it gave the District Court jurisdiction.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “nebulous and declamatory assertions, wholly unspecified.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Privilege of becoming an ‘exclusive bargaining agent’ is altogether distinct from the common law right of workmen to combine; it is a creature of Congress to whose grant Congress was free to attach such conditions as it saw fit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.