United States v. Cabrera’s Empirical Analysis
172 F.3d 1287 · 1999
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Barrington (2011), United States v. McNair (2010)
20 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Behrens v. Pelletier · Curry v. Brown · United States v. Lawrence · United States v. Sepulveda · United States v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“149 We review the district court's loss determination for clear error. United States v. Goldberg, 60 F.3d 1536 , 1539 (11th Cir. 1995). The guidelines do not require the government to make a fraud loss determination with precision; the figure need only be a reasonable estimate given the information available to the government. United States v. Dominguez, 109 F.3d 675 , 676 (11th Cir. 1997). Upon challenge, however, the government bears the burden of supporting its loss calculation with”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A sentencing court must make factual findings sufficient to support the government's claim of the amount of fraud loss attributed to a defendant in a PSI.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We hold that telephone cloning fraud loss is attributable to a defendant, and therefore can be utilized to enhance the defendant's sentence, only if the government provides reliable proof linking the defendant to the ESN/MIN combinations fraudulently used.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.