Bailey v. Nagle’s Empirical Analysis
172 F.3d 1299 · 1999
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Herring v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (2005), Judd v. Haley (2001)
33 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Bonner v. City of Prichard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the petitioner simply never raised a claim in state court, and it is obvious that the unexhausted claim would now be procedurally barred due to a state-law procedural default, the federal court may foreclose the petitioner’s filing in state court; the exhaustion requirement and procedural default principles combine to mandate dismissal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A habeas petitioner can escape the procedural default doctrine either through showing cause for the default and prejudice, or establishing a fundamental miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Isaacs v. Head“the state court correctly applies a procedural default principle of state law to arrive at the conclusion that the petitioner’s federal claims are barred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lynd v. Terry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.