Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 F.3d 764 - McNamar v. Apfel

McNamar v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis

172 F.3d 764 · 1999

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Lory Ann Ramey Renee Farmer Sherry Shupe v. Karen Reinertson (2001), 600 F. App'x 616 - Carver v. Colvin (2015)

3 federal appellate · 8 district ·

150199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala · Hawkins v. Chater · New Mexico Department of Human Services v. Department of Health & Human Services Health Care Financing Administration · Wilkins v. Callahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a set of policies issued by the Administration to be used in processing claims.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.