Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 F.3d 983 - Morse v. Hanks

Morse v. Hanks’s Empirical Analysis

172 F.3d 983 · 1999

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2024

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Lindh v. Murphy · United States v. Horsley · United States v. Stafford · Coulter v. Gilmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no basis for reversal on appeal unless the reason given is completely outlandish or there is other evidence which demonstrated its falsity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when the voir dire is as perfunctory as this one was — the potential jurors were asked little more than whether they would treat both sides equally — a prima facie case is established”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.