Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 FRD 96 - Weaver v. Chrysler Corp.

Weaver v. Chrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
5
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Cox v. Zurn Pex, Inc. (2011), Briehl

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

210199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Foman v. Davis · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P. · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where . . . a product performs satisfactorily and never exhibits the alleged defect, no cause of action lies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.