In re Edelman’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1996
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Youngstrom · In re Brockton Ideal Shoe Co. · In re Maxson · Hancock v. . Sears · Sverd v. Mostel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The following property is exempt from application to the satisfaction of a money judgment, except such part as a court determines to be unnecessary for the reasonable requirements of the judgment debtor and his dependents: ... 2. ninety per cent of the earnings of the judgment debtor for his personal ser vices rendered within sixty days before, and at any time after, an income execution is delivered to the sheriff or a motion is made to secure the application of the judgment debtor’s earnings to the satisfaction of the judgment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The debtor, or a third party who seeks to rely for his protection on the exemption of the debtor’s property in his hands[,] must satisfy the court of the necessity for the use. of the funds for which he seeks the statutory exemption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.