Perlman v. Timberlake’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 1986 · most notably Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Bobker (1986), United States v. Bell (1975)
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 26 U.S.C. § 401 (Self-Employed Individuals Tax Retirement Act of 1962)
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Eisner v. Macomber · National Broadcasting Co. v. United States · Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp. · Bingham's Trust v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Sec. 23. (a) The Commission and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall each have power to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary for the execution of the functions vested in them by this title, and may for such purpose classify issuers, securities, exchanges, and other persons or matters within their respective jurisdictions. No provision of this title imposing any liability shall apply to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any rule or regulation of the Commission or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, notwithstanding that such rule or regulation may, after such act or omission, be amended or rescinded or be determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.” 15 U.S.C.A. § 78w(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“deliberately given the status of . . . judicial dictum by the Court(s) uttering (them) . . . which while of great significance and entitled to this Court's respect does not preclude this Court from reaching its own decision after independent consideration and study of the question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boyd v. Henderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.