172 Ga. App. 857 - Munda v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably 232 Ga. App. 200 - In the Interest of C. W. D. (1998), 188 Ga. App. 129 - Whiteley v. State (1988)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Chambers · State v. Johnston · Perano v. State · 159 Ga. App. 326 - Gilbert v. State · 160 Ga. App. 71 - State v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The proscription on the jury's possession of `written testimony' does not extend to documents which are themselves relevant and admissible as original documentary evidence in a case. [Cit.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]hen the State seeks to prove the violation [of OCGA § 40-6-391] by evidence of a chemical test, the State has the burden of demonstrating compliance with the statutory requirements”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`consistent with the statutory mandate of the General Assembly that the use of such tests in criminal trials shall be subject to the strictest protections....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peek v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.