← 172 Ind. App. 81 - Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co.

172 Ind. App. 81 - Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

cited by 80 later decisions

states following

October 2002

most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently October 2002 · most notably Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong (1982), 175 Ind. App. 186 - State Farm v. Shuman, Admx. (1977)

11 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Sharp · 123 Ind. App. 709 - Murphy Auto Sales, Inc. v. Coomer · 135 Ind. App. 167 - MALONE, ADMR. ETC. v. Conner · 164 Ind. App. 368 - Lou Leventhal Auto Co., Inc. v. Munns · 154 Ind. App. 1 - Capitol Dodge, Inc. v. Haley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“It is unlawful for the holder of a beer brewer’s permit to hold, acquire, possess, own, or control, or to have an interest, claim or title in or to an establishment, company, or corporation holding or applying for a beer wholesaler’s permit under this title, or in its business.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. United Beverage Co. of South Bend, Inc. v. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission · 545 F. Supp. 1137 - Lafayette Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
“such factors as size and earning capacity of the wrongdoer should properly be considered,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. Robertson · Mohammed Hamed, Khalil Awwad and Michigan Foods, Inc. v. General Accident Insurance Company of America
“The transfer, sale, acquisition, assignment, control of, or beneficial interest, direct or indirect, in or to a beer wholesaler’s permit, or in its business, or in its corporate stock by a brewer contrary to the provisions of IC 1971, 7.15-9-2, or the transfer, assignment upon the capital stock book, or other corporate record, of a corporation holding a beer wholesaler’s permit, of the capital stock, or a part of it, is wholly void and not capable of validation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 545 F. Supp. 1137 - Lafayette Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.