Hukle v. Kimble’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1984
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Denton v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · Evans v. Moseley · Hukle v. Kimble · Carlgren v. Saindon · Bracken v. Champlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When specific controverted issues have been once determined in a trial, either before the court, or the court and the jury, and some points at issue have not been determined, or have been improperly determined, where the points determined and those not determined are sufficiently distinct from each other that there is no necessity of retrying all issues in order to determine those which had not been determined, there is no occasion for retrying the issues determined. A retrial, if necessary, should be of the issues only which have not been determined. . . .” (pp. 479, 480.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.