Vesper v. Brier’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1970
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Auto Trunk Co. v. Hahn · Ohio Hydrate & Supply Co. v. H. W. Underhill Construction Co. · Jensen v. City of Chanute · Auto Trunk Co. v. Hahn · Morse v. Schaake
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘. . . that said defendant shall prosecute his appeal to effect and without unnecessary delay, and satisfy such judgment and costs as may be rendered against him therein.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sogn v. Ratt““ ‘That said defendant will pay all costs of said appeal, as the Court may order and direct’.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sogn v. Ratt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.