Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

172 Mass. 521

Adams v. Swift

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1899

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1899-02-28

<p>Personal Injuries — Parent and Child — Negligence — A ction — Law and Fact — Evidence — Question for Jury.</p> <p>A-woman and her daughter were invited to join a party upon an excursion, and tlie former accepted the invitation on condition that she might pay one half the cost of the carriage, and made such payment. The party, consisting of four persons, occupied a two-seated carriage drawn by two spirited horses. The daughter, who was nineteen years old and of slight build, and had had very little experience in driving, was allowed to drive the horses. In returning from the excursion the carriage formed part of a long procession of carriages, and upon reaching a level stretch after coming down an incline in the road, the pole of the carriage entered the back of a carriage in front of it and injured a person therein. A by-stander, who knew the mother and daughter, called out to them, “ What are you trying to do 1 ” The daughter replied, “ Well, I can’t hold them,” and the mother said, “ She’s all right.” Subsequently the mother tried to conceal from the injured person the identity of the occupants of the carriage. Held, in an action against the mother and daughter for the injury, that the question of the mother’s liability was rightly submitted to the jury; and that the evidence of the admissions was also for the jury.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1899-02-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1982

12 state decisions

501899190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Barker, J.

¶1The evidence justified a finding that the excursion was a joint undertaking, of which Caroline F. Swift, the mother of the young woman who was driving when the accident happened, was an equal promoter and manager, and not a mere guest; and thatfunder her control and direction her daughter, so inexperienced a whip that it might be negligence to allow her to drive upon such an occasion, was driving, and driving carelessly. Therefore the case was for the jury.

¶2The evidence of admissions was for the jury, and the rulings were right.

¶3 Exceptions overruled.

/172/mass/521 · .json · Public domain