Davis v. Moses’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1962
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matheson v. O'Kane · Johnson v. Von Scholley · Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co. · Hartigan v. Dickson · Marion v. Heimbach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Respondents not being parties to these instruments were at liberty to show what actually was agreed upon and what was done, even though the evidence so adduced by them did vary the terms of the instruments.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rust
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.