172 N.C. App. 220 - State v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Sutton v. United States · Vidrio-Aleman v. United States · Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the total amount of hours and fees claimed by the court-appointed attorney.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“no indication in the record that [a] defendant was notified of and given an opportunity to be heard regarding the appointed attorney's total hours or the total amount of fees imposed,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]errorizing is defined as 'more than just putting another in fear. It means putting that person in some high degree of fear, a state of intense fright or apprehension.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.