Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 172 N.C. App. 628 - State v. Rashidi

172 N.C. App. 628 - State v. Rashidi’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Fahy v. Connecticut · New Jersey v. New York · Delta Airlines, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance · State v. Harvey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “During a closing argument to the jury an attorney may not become abusive, inject his personal experiences, express his personal belief as to the truth or falsity of the evidence or as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant, or make arguments on the basis of matters outside the record except for matters concerning which the court may take judicial notice. An attorney may, however, on the basis of his analysis of the evidence, argue any position or conclusion with respect to a matter in issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he State must show more than the package was addressed to defendant and contained [a controlled substance], since such proof does not necessarily establish defendant's knowledge of the contents of the package and his intent to exercise control over the [controlled substance].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he State [is] not required to show who placed the [controlled substance] in the parcel. It [is] required to show defendant knew or expected that the package contained [the controlled substance] and intended to control its disposition or use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.