172 N.C. App. 801 - State v. Baublitz, Jr.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty · State v. Harvey · State v. Barden · Gerrow v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is strictly limited to determining whether the trial judge's underlying findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, in which event they are conclusively binding on appeal, and whether those factual findings in turn support the judge's ultimate conclusions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[w]here the driver is in control of the car . . . and the controlled substance is found in the car . . . such evidence is sufficient to withstand motion for dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“constructive possession can be inferred when there is evidence that a defendant had the power to control the vehicle where a controlled substance was found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.